Earlier this year the city of Oakland petitioned for a gang injunction on one of the city’s most dangerous gangs, North Side Oakland (NSO). If the injunction is approved by a judge it will create a safety zone of about 100 blocks between Berkeley, Emeryville, and Telegraph Avenue. The injunction will also prohibit NSO and its members from any “gang” activity and from creating a "public nuisance" in that zone. There are rules gang members will have to obey while being in the safety zone. But not everybody likes the idea of an injunction. We spoke to a North Oakland resident, Lisa Nowlain who says a gang injunction won’t create a safe zone like authorities plan:
Q: How safe is your neighborhood?
A: I have never had an issue with safety in my neighborhood. I know that there are issues here though, with shootings, police chasing folks down MLK at 70 mph, etc, and I do not minimize the need to address people's bodily safety and feeling that they can move freely in their neighborhood, but I think more police will hurt my neighborhood more than it will help it.
Q:Why are you against Oakland’s gang injunction?
A: I think that the only proven result of a gang injunction is that people of color and poor people, and particularly young people, will be taken off the streets and put under surveillance. When people of color and poor people are off the streets, a neighborhood is open for private development and gentrification…I am against gang injunctions because if it doesn't make me safer, destroys my community, and will displace and hurt too many of my neighbors. I don't feel that anything justifies this kind of harsh suppression or secret policing (they named 19 people that they filed the injunction against, but there are many more that aren't on the public list and will never be able to fight it).
Q: Why is a gang injunction not the safest method or the right method of handling one of Oakland’s dangerous gang?
A: Putting a lot of money into policing not only is objectionable because I think policing is oppressive and linked to a wider system, but it just doesn't work. Suppression doesn't work address why youth form street organizations: lack of resources or organizations in their neighborhoods (ie after school programs, an engaging and non-militarized school setting, parks, access to the outdoors, etc), legacies of economic impoverishment, and the other aspects of the long racist history of our country. Therefore, it not only moves violence somewhere else in Oakland or the Bay Area because it doesn't address root problems, but it makes it harder for young people to get out of being affiliated with a "gang" by putting them in databases or in prison, making it harder to get jobs later in life. Letting the police decide who is part of a street organization and who isn't is asking for trouble and removes accountability and community voices from how our communities are organized.
More after the jump...
Read more...