March 15, 2010

Search

Arts & Entertainment
Curating Voices
Education
En Español
Environmental
Family
Health
International
Jobs & Money
Lifestyle
Poetry
Politics
Reflections on Return
Relationships
Radio Juventud
Society
Sports

YR in the News

Podcasts

YR via RSS

For Educators
Teach Youth Radio
Curriculum

Youth Programs
CORE
Outreach

Survivor

"If they kept the race-based teams separate, viewers may have seen that race isn’t always 'black and white.'"

By Jordan Monroe

Listen to this Commentary!

Even if you're not a Survivor fan, you may have heard about CBS adding a twist to the beginning of the season when the show separated contestants by race. But the segregated teams kicked up controversy when big sponsors, like General Motors and Coca Cola, pulled out before the season started - taking nearly $26 million with them. Youth Radio's Jordan Monroe reflects on Survivor's racial divisions...and why the show de-segregated teams after a few episodes. (October 19 on Marketplace)


When I saw the groups on this season's run of "Survivor" — the Whites, Asians, Hispanics and Blacks — hey, I wanted to be mad, I wanted to be surprised, but I wasn't.

Within a few minutes, I was actually entertained. I didn't get the sense the contestants were trying to prove their racial superiority. Let's be real, Survivor's gimmick was all about the Benjamins. Like sex, drugs and rock and roll, race sells.

What's interesting to me is that I didn't hear anyone my age complaining. No signs of disapproval on Myspace. And no gossip about it at school. Young people sometimes prefer to be with their own racial groups.

But that doesn't mean we can't appreciate and respect ethnic differences. Because we've also grown up being exposed to people of different ethnicities.

Take me, for example. I was raised in the Bay Area, a cultural melting pot. So when the subject of race comes up, I don't start hyper-perspiring. Instead, like many of my peers, I'm willing and open to talk about race. So, the race-separate groups of Survivor didn't frighten me. Instead, they pointed to a reality I already understood.

Now, I do understand the hullabaloo. It can definitely be risky business to incorporate serious social issues into an entertaining reality show.

But I think that the producers of Survivor may have missed a golden opportunity to make television history. Sure they were pushing buttons, but if they kept the race-based teams separated, viewers may have seen that race isn't always "black and white." We all expected racial tension, but instead we got tension between the women and men in the Black group, distrust and backstabbing within the Latino and White groups, and self-stereotyping among Asians.

That's where the show started getting interesting.

Now the question is: With Survivor's controversial experiment over, will viewers stay tuned in? Well it worked for me. Since I've already invested five weeks into it, I might as well watch the rest.


Jordan Monroe and his daughter regularly watch "Survivor", a popular reality show on CBS that features teams competing for money in the wilderness.
Credit: Jordan Monroe, Youth Radio


"The race-separate groups on 'Survivor' didn’t frighten me. They pointed to a reality I already understood..."


After running two episodes, the producers of "Survivor" decided to desegragate the racially divided teams.
Credit: CBS Primetime


Read what others say about the segregated survivor "tribes":

· GEICO, Mitsubishi, Target, Verizon will not advertise on 'Survivor'
· 'Survivor' And Race
·'Survivor': The Race Card
· Why Race-Based 'Survivor' Makes Us Squirm


about us | radio | video| archives | get involved | support us
youthradio@youthradio.org ©copyright 2008, Youth Radio