|
Larry Eustachy Out
Was it the right decision?
By Mike Oseroff
Mike Oseroff is Youth Radio’s resident sports commentator
and columnist. Keep checking this space for his weekly updates! You can email
him at sports@youthradio.org.
Like hamburgers and French fries, presents and Christmas, and
Batman and Robin, few things in our culture go hand and hand like college and
drinking. And while many people regard college parties as all fun and good times,
some things just aren’t very funny. Like a 47-year old college basketball
coach, who is married with children, partying with students from a rival school
immediately following a loss to their team. That’s not funny. In fact,
that’s so downright creepy it’s enough to stop the music and make
the kegs run dry. And that’s exactly what happened to Iowa State Head
Basketball Coach Larry Eustachy a week ago.
Yes, as ridiculous as it may seem, the 2000 National Coach of
the Year made a big mistake at a January 22nd drink-a-thon he let someone
take pictures of him and a week ago, like most incriminating photographs
do, they showed up on the front page of the paper in all their glory. Gracing
the cover of Iowa’s Des Moines Register, the photos unmistakably showed
Eustachy mingling with 20-year-olds, holding beers, and kissing some young,
attractive college coeds at a student’s apartment in Columbia, Missouri.
Eustachy and his Iowa State Cyclones had lost an away game to
Missouri just hours before the party. According to an article printed with the
pictures, the coach showed up with Missouri player Josh Kroenke (Eustachy and
Kroenke’s father are friends), drank several beers, made disparaging remarks
about his team, verbally abused a partygoer who objected to his presence there,
and made a pass at several young girls before the residents of the apartment
called a cab for him. Not bad for a night’s work. Also in the article
was an account from a Kansas State student, who claimed Eustachy had showed
up at a frat party in 2002, also following a Cyclone loss. She was quoted as
saying that the coach commented on her looks and asked where she was from. When
she replied that she hailed from Lawrence, Kansas, site of Kansas University,
Eustachy asked why she didn’t attend KU and remarked, “The girls
there are much hotter, you belong there.”
This behavior raised some eyebrows to say the least, and Eustachy’s
job was on the line. He admitted he is an alcoholic, was extremely remorseful,
and intended to enter rehab and hopefully regain his credibility. So the issue
was, should Eustachy be allowed a second chance and another shot at head coach,
or should he be dropped like a bad habit? For a week the world debated while
Larry pleaded his case, and finally on Monday the school made its decision:
Coach Eustachy is done at Iowa State.
The question is, was it the right choice?
First off, it is worth mentioning that Larry Eustachy had a great
track record. It isn’t as if we are talking about some unknown drunk from
a Division 4 school at least he had some credentials. To go along with
his National Coach of The Year award for 2000, he won back-to-back Big 12 Conference
Championships in 2000 and 2001, and coached his squad to the Elite Eight in
the NCCA Tournament three years ago. He had over 250 wins under his belt, including
101 in five seasons in Iowa, and became the state’s highest paid employee,
receiving over $1.1 million a year. What I’m saying is, he’s not
easily replaceable.
To go along with all of that, Eustachy made a firm promise to
enter rehabilitation and pursue a life of sobriety. He acknowledged he had a
serious drinking problem, and was willing to go the extra mile to conquer it.
So what is wrong with giving him another shot? Surely an athlete caught in a
situation such as his would be allowed one. Heck, the NFL has given convicted
criminals opportunities to clear their slates with second chances. Why not Larry?
Why? Because he is a 47-year-old coach. We aren’t talking
about a young and naive college athlete. This guy is pushing 50 and is in wedlock
with two kids to go along with it. He should definitely know better. As a respected
member of his school, his community, and his state, he has an obligation to
set a good example. And what he did was immature and disgusting.
As far as his “promise” to better his life, it all
too suspiciously seems insincere. He has undoubtedly been aware of his addiction,
yet waited until it was exposed to the whole world before he suddenly felt obligated
to get treatment for it. Funny how that works.
What should also be noted is the fact that Eustachy wasn’t
just partying, he was partying with young, drunk, college girls. If you were
the highest paid employee in your entire state, you could easily afford the
finest champagne, and could throw your own party every night if you wanted to.
Yet Eustachy chose to drink the cheapest beer and get down with kids younger
than half his age. If I didn’t know better, I’d say Eustachy had
more than just a drinking problem and that may very well be the case.
And finally, what about his players, the people whose performances
on the court are putting the extra zeroes in his monthly paycheck? Playing college
ball is a big step up from high school. You are nationally televised. You are
scouted. You are on ESPN. Your every move is analyzed. The pressure to perform
well and stay composed is very strong, and your coach is supposed to be the
one to help you through it. How do you think the kids felt when they realized
the man they looked up to couldn’t even take care of himself? What do
you think Eustachy was saying in the huddle in crunch time in the fourth quarter
of the Missouri game? “Guys, I want you to play your hearts out and leave
it all on the floor, but if you don’t, it’s still okay because I’m
going to party with the other team when this game is over.”
As a player, seeing your coach do something like that is no doubt
disheartening, and it isn’t right for the spirit and competitive nature
of basketball.
So I conclude by saying Iowa State did the right thing be cutting
Larry Eustachy. Everyone is entitled to mistakes, but the circumstances call
for what is in the best interest for the players, the school, and the community:
to instate a positive role model to represent them. Sure it’s a little
unfair that he doesn’t get another shot, but frankly I don’t think
he needs one. Seems as if he’s taken a few too many “shots”
for his own good already.
Check out more of Mike's columns!
|
|